Diploma Mills: A professional discussion of bad schools
The chief U.S. Congressional sponsors of U.S. Senate Bill S1455 had ties to the same non-profit orgnizations that would later be identified with a known a federal informant identifed in U.S. Department of Justice files as a key partner in promotion of the Bill. The federal informant was recruited in conjuction with other "partners" of a covert campaign to mislead the general public of the extent of certain types of purported financial-aid fraud while conveniently ignoring routine abuses in the $85 billion dollar student-loan industry.
Avoid Diploma Mills. Research First before you apply.
In April of 1999, and again in November of 1999, this Publisher published a series of Media Reports regarding U.S. Senate Bill S1455. The November 1999 report, in particular, discussed the seedy relationships that seemed to exist between various professional members of certain prominent non-profit organizations and student-loan providers. The report also discussed the circuitous route of how U.S. Senate Bill S1455 became enacted into law, and the elaborate scheme to promote legislation of the Bill.
Raging like wildfire Diploma Mills.
Amongst other things, both reports discussed the murky relationships that seemed to exist between certain non-profit orgnizations, members of these organizations, and their chief advertisers, and how a discredited government informant was used in conjunction with many of these perons to promote legislation of U.S. Senate Bill S1455.The reports were directed at users of the NAAS website, donors of financial aid funds, content providers of financial aid-related services, scholarship search services, and sponsors of merit and competition based scholarships. However, then, as now, the message remains relevant to the concerns of all persons and businessess whom do not want their tax dollars being used to endorse, subsidize, recommend, or promote unsavory groups and individuals or unethical relationships. Accreditation Test for Diploma Mills.
The chief U.S. Congressional sponsors of U.S. Senate Bill S1455 had ties to the same non-profit orgnizations that would later be identified with a known a federal informant identifed in U.S. Department of Justice files as a key partner in promotion of the Bill. The federal informant was recruited in conjuction with other "partners" of a covert campaign to mislead the general public of the extent of certain types of purported financial-aid fraud while conveniently ignoring routine abuses in the $85 billion dollar student-loan industry.With assistance from unethical non-profit organizations and their equally unethical and/or corrupt members, federal goverment employees (some of which had professional ties to convicted traitor Robert Phillip Hanssen), the budding government informant was provided the phony title of "Financial-aid Expert" to lend support to his self-created theories and credibility. As an added measure, it was decided by representatives of the U.S. Dept. of Justice, the U.S. Dept. of Education, and certain other federal agencies, that their informant would also needs a "legitimate sponsor." Thus, the federal informant hastily created a for-profit shell corporation that was simply an alter-ego extension of himself. A prominent non-profit association of colleges, univerties, and post-secondary institutions, accepted the recommendations of the federal government. This organization willingly, deliberately, and wantonly agreed to serve as the "exclusive" sponsor of the federal informant's hastily created shell corporation.
It should be noted that the federal informant did not have a single day of experience as an "expert" in the areas he sought to critic and give "advice" about.With "exclusive sponsorship" from the non-profit organization came many benefits. The informant was allowed to use the non-profit seal of the organization as part of marketing package and on his for-profit website. When the informant was threatened with lawsuits by competitors for alleged deceptive and unfair business practices, or by persons who felt defamed by his inflammatory and misleading articles, attorneys who were also members of and chief advertisers in the membership directory of his chief sponsor sprang to his defense. Whether or not this intrinsic benefit and indirect income was reported on the federal tax forms of this informant is unclear. However, it is estimated that if a private person were to be independently charged for the same services, then the expenses woould be close to $100,000.00While their professional colleague served as an "exclusive sponsor" of the shell corporation owned by the federal informant, members of a particular alphabet-related non-profit organization were directed to parrot, promote, and distribute the Socialist dogma of the informant on an electronic list-serve bulletin board operated by the same organization. These unethical members challenged their colleagues to promote the politcal beliefs of the informant, to engage in a form a censorship against and to report any organization that assessed legitimate fees for the administration of of merit awards, even organizations that charged small amounts of $1 or $2 for one-time handling fees.
Definition of Diploma Mills
These members would cajole other members to investigate organizations that departed from the Socialist criteria of the federal informant whose key Lenin-like maxim was and remains "Never pay money to get money" or, "Never pay more than the cost of a postage stamp." I guess its time for Merrill Lynch, Smith & Barney, J.P. Morgan, Charles Schwab, Las Vegas Casinos, and many other financial powerhouses of mainsteam American capitalistic culture to throw in the towel too. With his theories, Wall Street should presumably be re-named Vladamir Lenin Avenue or Karl Marx Road.If based in California, the informant would draft "criteria" that would attack California companies. If based in Nevada, the informant would draft "criteria" that would attack Nevada corporations. If based in Florida, attack Florida companies. With respect to Nevada, in 1996, and each year thereafter until his company was sold, the federal informant published a series of misleading and deceptive statements about corporate entities in Nevada, and targeted Nevada corporations in general although he offered no indendent data, facts or sources to substantiate his personal theories. The corrupt federal informant would routinely change his "criteria about what was or was not a "financial-aid scam" or his "warnings" dependent upon not what prevailing federal law says but his own personal beliefs, the identity of his target, and the perceived location of the target. Members of certain unethical non-profit organizations adopted his subtle messages, and re-fashioned their literature accordingly. .
Federal Informant Dupes U.S. Senators
Student-loan fraud ignored In 1999, a duped U.S. Senator from Michigan drafted a poorly written piece of legislation that specifically ignored student-loan fraud committed by student-loan companies, ignored financial-aid fraud by lenders at big banks, and ignored financial-aid fraud by members of the same organization linked to the sponsorship of the federal informant. Instead, the legislation targeted companies that seemingly fit the fictitious profile of companies targeted by the East-coast based federal informant.
- U.S. Senator Larry Craig, Republican from Idaho. Despite being married to a woman, and having children, Craig was caught soliciting a perverted homosexual act in a public restroom. After a public uproar of his act, he announced his resignation effective resignation effective September 30, 2007;
- U.S. Senator Mark Foley, Republican from Florida. Virtually every major newspaper in Florida had been writing articles on the congressman's inept attempts to hide his perverse homosexual desires and attraction to the same gender. He resigned his congressional seat after sexually explicit e-mails surfaced connecting the congressman with a former male page.
- Former Rep. John Ford, Democrat from Tennessee. John Ford was sentenced to 66 months in prison in August 2007 for his April 2007 conviction of accepting $55,000 in bribes. Ford, a Democratic state senator for 31 years, was one of 12 lawmakers or aides charged in the sweeping statewide investigation, 11 of whom have pleaded guilty or been convicted in trial.
- Former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham, Republican from Califonia. In March of 2006, Cunningham was sentenced to eight years and four months in federal prison for taking $2.4 million in bribes from at least three defense contractors. The sentence is the highest ever for a former member of Congress, prosecutor Jason Forge said. He should have been sentenced to 10 years in prison, but U.S. District Judge Larry Burns went soft on Cunningham for such immaterial reasons as Cunningham's military service, age and health, Forge said.
- U.S. Attorney General Gonzales. Republican from Texas. The first Hispanic Attorney General in the history of the United States, and an affirmative action appointee, resigned over possible allegations of perjury, the public perception that he is incompetent, and dishonest. Under his leadership, political pundits have written that Americans have been subject to the most invasive,oppressive, and expansive curtailment of civil liberties that at any other time in history.
Any definition of a Diploma Mill should be used in conjunction with existing federal laws. Therefore, new NAAS EAS/N2 Rules 749, 750, address Diploma Mills, and Accreditation Mills respectively.